Kin Album

FamilyAlbum vs Tinybeans

Two of the oldest family photo apps, compared on the things that actually differ: what they cost, what they do with your photos, and how each one is paid for.

Updated September 12, 2026

We make a competing app, so here is the deal: every factual claim below is quoted from something FamilyAlbum or Tinybeans published themselves, linked and dated at the bottom. Where we could not find a source, the page says so instead of guessing. Kin Album appears once, at the end, and you can skip it.

The short version

FamilyAlbum is the better-built sharing app of the two. It is fast, it is easy for relatives, and its free tier is unusually generous. Its published paid plans are $2.99, $5.99 and $10.99 a month1. Its trade-off is what its software does with the pictures — face recognition and per-face data are a documented part of how the product works.

Tinybeans is the better daily journal. The calendar shape — one day, one set of photos, a note — is the thing its users stay for, and it has been doing it for over a decade. Its trade-off is how it is funded: its paid tier’s first advertised benefit is “an ad-free experience”2, and its privacy policy contains the advertising disclosures that implies.

What each one does with your photos

This is the biggest real difference between them, and both companies document it themselves.

FamilyAlbum’s privacy policy, last updated 18 August 2026, lists among the data collected “perceptual hashes of photographs and video clips, feature vectors of users’ faces, the estimated gender and age of each user’s face, results of classifications of facial images of each user”, filed under biometric and sensitive personal information3. Its developer’s own engineering page says “facial/person recognition is performed on photos and videos using deep learning”4. That is not hidden; it is how the per-child pages, the automatic movies and the search work.

Tinybeans’ policy is broader and less specific. It says the company “may use automated processes and machine learning to analyze User Content, User Submissions, Feedback and Responses”5. We found no mention of facial recognition or face data in it. Less detail is not the same as less processing — it is less disclosure, and which of those it is, we cannot tell you.

Neither app is end-to-end encrypted. FamilyAlbum’s privacy page says “data transferred between your device and our servers is encrypted using the latest encryption technology”11, which is encryption in transit; Tinybeans’ policy does not mention encryption at all. In both cases the company can open the photos. We explain why that distinction matters in can family photo apps see your photos?

How each one is paid for

FamilyAlbum is free with paid upgrades, and in November 2025 a parent left over advertising, writing that “the latest app update has big, distracting banner ads showing so I’m on the hunt for an alternative”13. That is one person’s report at one point in time, not a permanent product fact — what a free tier looks like changes.

Tinybeans is explicit that advertising is part of the business. Its privacy policy says in capitals that it “will not sell, share or trade the personal information you submit to any unrelated third parties, mass marketers, or to other non-affiliated entities for their marketing purposes without your consent”6, and separately, in its California disclosures, that the company “may ‘sell’ and/or ‘share’ personal information with third party partners as part of targeted advertising initiatives”7 — the quotation marks around sell and share are theirs, and they matter, because under California law those words cover ordinary ad-tech data flows and not only a cash sale. The categories it lists as sold or shared in the preceding twelve months are identifiers, internet or other electronic network activity, and commercial information8. The policy also names its advertising affiliation: “this Service is affiliated with Publisher First, dba Freestar (‘Freestar’) for the purposes of placing advertising on the Service”9.

Both sentences are in the same document, and both are true — the first is about the content you submit, the second about advertising identifiers. Reading only one of them gives you the wrong picture, which is why both are quoted here.

FamilyAlbum’s policy names its own recipients too, including “Anthropic (to provide customer support and to improve search functionality)”10. When parents asked about that in 2026, the company said no photos or videos are entered into those models — the fuller account is on our explainer page.

Video

FamilyAlbum publishes the clearest numbers of the two: premium plans can “upload videos up to 10 minutes long”1, and video resolution depends on the plan — the top tier lists “max resolution 1920 x 1080”12and the tier below is lower. If video matters to you, check which plan you are on rather than which app you chose. We found no published video length limit for Tinybeans.

Side by side

Based on what each company published, checked on the dates in the sources below. Products and policies change; check before relying on any of it.

Which one to pick

Pick FamilyAlbum if the priority is relatives actually using it. It is the smoother sharing experience, the free tier goes a long way, and the automatic organisation is genuinely good. Pick it with your eyes open about the face data, which is the price of that organisation.

Pick Tinybeans if what you want is a diary you will still be reading in fifteen years. The day-by-day structure changes how much you record, and people who love it love it for that. Budget for the paid tier if advertising bothers you.

Pick neither if the thing you actually care about is that no company can open the photographs. Neither of these is built that way, and no setting inside them changes it.

Where Kin Album sits

Kin Album is a private family photo album where photos and videos are encrypted on your iPhone before they upload and the company holds no key, so we cannot open them. It is $9.99 a month, or $99.99 a year, for everyone you invite and relatives never pay. There is no free tier and no trial.

Against the two apps above, it loses on several things that are worth naming. There is no free plan. Albums are created and posted to from an iPhone. There is no search by what is in a photo and no automatic highlight movie, because those need a server that can read your pictures. And captions, comments and the small preview image in an emailed update sit outside the encryption — that last one is off by default for a member and on by default for a relative who only has email. It wins on exactly one thing, and it is the one neither of them claims.

Related: Can family photo apps see your photos? · FamilyAlbum alternatives · Sharing photos with grandparents who aren’t tech-savvy

The longer version of this comparison, on all fifteen criteria and with every fact quoted from the apps’ own pages: FamilyAlbum vs Tinybeans at familyphotoapps.com, a comparison site we run.

Home · Help · Security · Privacy Policy